Skip to content Skip to navigation

State security authorities extort June Fourth funds

February 9, 2000

During a recent visit to China, Wen-he Lu was forcibly prevented from delivering over $25,000 in humanitarian assistance funds to Ding Zilin and the families of June 4 victims. On his way to Ding Zilin’s home, Lu was pulled over, coercively detained for interrogation and placed under residential surveillance for the remainder of his visit. Following repeated threats to his family, friends and personal freedom, Lu was forced to sign over the humanitarian assistance funds, which were held in a U.S. bank account, to Chinese State Security authorities. Currently, State Security officials are threatening Lu’s 78 year-old father, who had agreed to be Lu’s guarantor, because authorities have not been successful in receiving the funds. Authorities have threatened to repossess the elder Lu’s house and have it sold if the $25,000 is not paid.

Such excessive measures demonstrate the continuing persecution of June 4 victims, who are forbidden to publicly mourn the loss of their loved ones and are denied even purely humanitarian assistance from abroad. Against the backdrop of China’s intensifying crackdown, such measures also illustrate the aggressive drive with which State Security organs are implementing national security laws in order to squelch all perceived signs of dissent.

Throughout the time of Lu’s interrogation, State Security officers insisted that Lu had violated Chinese law by “endangering state security.” The outrageousness of Lu’s detention, the confiscation of $25,000 from a U.S. bank account, and the persecution of Lu’s elderly father--all for the simple “crime” of delivering humanitarian assistance funds to the families of June 4 victims--demonstrates the Chinese authorities’ gross abuse of the vaguely defined concept of “state security,” and the true means by which China implements “rule by law.” Under China’s much-touted system of “rule by law,” the law is imposed on citizens--promulgated, enforced and arbitrarily interpreted to suit the interests of the ruling elites. In this case, the law not only strips its own citizens of basic rights, it is also extended to manipulate banking transactions in a U.S. bank, violating the goodwill of international business norms.

[Full text of the press release is available in Chinese only.]

Related Articles:

Explore Topics

709 Crackdown Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention All about law Arbitrary Detention
Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship
Charter 08 Children Chinese Law Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists
Citizen Participation Civil Society Commentary Communist Party Of China Constitution Consumer Safety
Contending views Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current affairs Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Elections Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China
Family Planning Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion
Government Accountability Government regulation Government transparency Hong Kong House Arrest HRIC Translation
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights developments Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control 
Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International perspective International Relations
Internet Internet Governance JIansanjiang lawyers' rights defense Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics One country, two systems Online Activism Open Government Information Personal stories
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Probing history
Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Special Topic State compensation
State Secrets State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories
Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations US-China 
Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women Youth Youth Perspective