Skip to content Skip to navigation

Upcoming Vote on Revised Criminal Procedure Law Raises Procedural and Censorship Concerns

March 13, 2012

On Wednesday, March 14, China’s legislature, the National People’s Congress (NPC) is expected to vote to adopt proposed revisions to the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) amid troubling questions about the substance of the legislation, procedural irregularities, censorship of online discussion.

On March 8, Wang Zhaoguo (王兆国), Vice Chairman of the NPC Standing Committee, presented to the legislature an “Explanatory Note” on the pending legislation, which detailed the content of the current draft.  At a press conference that day, Lang Sheng (郎胜), Vice Chairman of the Legislative Affairs Commission of the 11th NPC, emphasized to reporters that “there is no ‘secret detention and arrest’ in our country, and there is no such provision in the law.” (我国没有“秘密拘捕”,法律也没有这样的规定。) On the same day, many media stories and observers reported progress in curbing police power which was expanded in the proposed new Article 73 provision on residential surveillance in the August 2011 draft.  In addition to extensive concerns raised by legal experts, Chinese netizens have expressed concerns not only about the controversial provision, but also about apparent procedural irregularities in the legislative process. This public online discussion has also been targeted by censors, who have blocked search results for “National People’s Congress Standing Committee” and “Standing Committee.”

An earlier draft of the proposed revised CPL, made public in August 2011, attracted over 80,000 comments. (Draft revisions are available in Chinese original and in English translation by the Danish Institute for Human Rights.)

That draft included several positive provisions such as judicial oversight of compulsory psychiatric treatment and increased protection for juvenile suspects. However, a new draft provision, Article 73, expanded and in effect legalized the widespread practice of secret residential surveillance not authorized by existing law. The article drew heavy criticism from Chinese and international legal experts. 


Procedural Concerns

Notwithstanding the assertion in the “Explanatory Note” that the Standing Committee had circulated a draft of the proposed revisions to NPC deputies on January 11, Chinese language media reported that many NPC deputies said they did not receive the proposed draft until they arrived in Beijing to attend the NPC session which opened on March 5. Article 15 of the Legislation Law of the People's Republic of China states: “When the Standing Committee decides to submit a legislative bill to a session of the National People's Congress for deliberation, it shall distribute the draft bill to the deputies one month before the session is convoked.” (Translation source.)

Restriction of Public Discussions

On March 11, Xiong Wei (熊伟), a researcher on citizen participation in the legislative process, posted a message on his micro-blog (weibo) urging the NPC to delay the vote because the process did not conform to Article 15 of the Legislation Law.

This message was deleted several hours after it was posted, by which time, the message had already been reposted more 18,000 times.  After the removal of the original message, a weibo user posted a comment on Xiong Wei’s weibo that included his reposting of Xiong Wei’s message. Subsequently, Xiong Wei posted another similar message, but it too, appeared to have been removed on March 13.  

On March 11, Xue Manzi (薛蛮子), a successful businessman, launched a public opinion survey on Sina weibo, posing the question: “Should the NPC vote on Article 73 of the proposed revised CPL?” Access to the survey was blocked in a matter of hours, after it had generated more than 10,000 responses, of which 93% voted “no.” 

Together with the NPC Standing Committee issuing an “Explanatory Note” instead of making public the current draft, censorship of public online discussion raises a number of troubling questions on the eve of the scheduled vote: What exactly does the proposed legislation include? What are the main revisions to the current draft since the draft reportedly disseminated to the delegates in January 2012?  Why were recent online discussions of the procedural and substantive questions censored?

Explore Topics

709 Crackdown Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention All about law Arbitrary Detention
Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship
Charter 08 Children Chinese Law Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists
Citizen Participation Civil Society Commentary Communist Party Of China Constitution Consumer Safety
Contending views Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current affairs Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Elections Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China
Family Planning Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion
Government Accountability Government regulation Government transparency Hong Kong House Arrest HRIC Translation
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights developments Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control 
Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International perspective International Relations
Internet Internet Governance JIansanjiang lawyers' rights defense Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics One country, two systems Online Activism Open Government Information Personal stories
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Probing history
Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Special Topic State compensation
State Secrets State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories
Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations US-China 
Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women Youth Youth Perspective
Error | Human Rights in China 中国人权 | HRIC


The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.